The outcry "cross" of MPs opposed to the resettlement of Trieste Marina Monassi comes as President of the Port Authority to demonstrate that, in case there were any Need further, that the ratification of that sign Round by the President was not at all digested. And 'well, however, point out that it is no longer oppose the nomination of more or less unpleasant, it is to intervene and make a battle for the future of the port of Trieste. The Project on the so-called Unicredit superporto Monfalcone - Trieste is proving its inconsistency. Slipped further financial plan, which was to be presented later this year, local media have also recently certified that, instead of synergies Trieste - Monfalcone is shaping the superporto Monfalcone, while the port of Trieste would remain isolated. Please refer to 2016, the forecast arrival of the first container ship in the new stop, leaving unresolved the question of funding constraints, as in all cases of project financing, an initial payment consisting result, we can quantify to be about ten times higher than the thirty million euro continues to deny that the CIPE for the construction of platform logistics in the port of Trieste. Uncertain and unclear the issue of trafficking should ensure that the Maersk between now and 2033, the date indicated for the set up of the project. It will take three to four million TEUs of traffic to justify spending and investment. Today, the same agreements with Maersk search giant China Cosco to ensure 800,000 TEUs of traffic in Vado Ligure, because it alone can not saturate the terminal. Unicredit
The project stipulates that from now to 2033 Trieste and its port you can forget to have adequate rail connections and most likely CIPE funds for logistics platform. You choose to dig 9.3 million cubic meters to get to deep water Monfalcone as those that are now available in Trieste. It is expected, but do not know what legal basis to appoint a special commissioner to follow the implementation of the project, perhaps indicated by the bank itself, but is silent on the fact that such a scenario would result in a downgrading of the international port of Trieste on a regional scale.
Who should protect and defend the project from Trieste and its port? We they can do all those, starting with members of Trieste, have understood that to realize the expected 350,000 TEUs in 2016, Monfalcone, it probably benefited from enhanced rail services, will necessarily have to draw on the existing traffic today Molo VII by subtracting those trades to our city and maybe using € 500 million to build a "twin" of the Molo VII in its harbor. We think
Monassi Marina to protect the interests of Trieste? The new president "in pectore," despite the ongoing inquiry of the Court of Auditors for the fees concessions at the Old Port and Budgets in the red port dating of his first presidency, is also vice president dell'Unicredit Corporate Banking.
There is a battle to do in defense of Trieste and its port and we reiterate that Claudio Boniciolli would be the ideal ally to protect the interests of the citizens of the city. We are ready to engage with anyone who wishes to counter this offensive, which the Port of Trieste certainly lead to a definitive decline. Serve, to begin, a few slogans: reconfirmation of the President of the Port Authority, investment and logistics platform for the immediate construction of a real project, realistic and less expensive for the Northern Adriatic ports, starting from the enhancement of existing features and capabilities.
order to take this battle you must leave the "cage" equidistance, which are also inexplicably relegated authoritative voices of the local PD. It 'good that the city knows that without the port will not have a problem to some hundreds of jobs, but we deal with thousands of job losses. Anybody want this?
Trieste, 27.12.2010
Igor Kocijančič
Regional Councillor PRC - SE
0 comments:
Post a Comment